Several years ago Christian Schwarz did research on what were the eight essential qualities of a healthy church. I think it was well done research and he developed Natural Church Development (NCD) out of it. The theory was that you should identify your weaknesses out of the eight qualities and work to improve them. It was the old "weakest link" argument. Our church took one of the assessments that they provided and I think our weakest quality was Ministry but I don't remember for sure.
The thing I liked about NCD was its emphasis on a biotic approach. It recognized that a church is a living, breathing organism and not a machine. That fit well with the weakest link idea because nature is filled with examples of the weakest link being the limiting factor. (A mineral deficiency will stunt plant growth.)
But working on your weaknesses can be depressing. Who wants to put tons of effort into what your bad at doing? Gallup has now come out with a new report that basically says that strength based development nets you the biggest return. One of the big reasons for this is employees are motivated because they love their work. Interesting. I think Schwarz might have identified the problem but missed how you fix it.
Strengths
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10:11 AM
If church is not a business, why do we treat it that way?
9:16 PM
My favorite analogy for a church is an expedition. I am a fan of books detailing expeditions to places like Everest, the South Pole, and the like. An expedition is a group of people trying to accomplish a common goal. They all bring something different to the table....
Ah I've written this before somewhere but the point is there is still a need for leadership and organization. In fact we even see it in Scripture so while I don't like thinking of church as a business it still requires leadership.
10:59 PM
8:57 AM
11:32 AM
I am having an offline conversation about this very topic with another blogger - I may send you the same email. Because mostly the issue is me.
4:10 AM
Post a Comment