Forsaken

Posted by: Tom,

Having spent a significant portion of my life living in Sierra Leone I find it sickening how the rebel war there, as well as so many other conflicts in Africa, are basically ignored by the rest of the world. I would blame it on the media but they only get part of the blame. They are a business after all and if we as ordinary people cared about these conflicts the media would probably cover them.

It is not just about coverage either. Along with that coverage goes time and money. So governments, institutions, and influential people spend tons of time and money on the most popular contests while the conflicts that have impacted the most people receive hardly any attention.

Some would say that while those smaller conflicts may not have the same number of deaths they still impact far more people. I believe that is true. But why is that? There is something wrong about the way we value people.

Here's some stats I pulled from the Stealth Conflicts website. They have a lot of interesting information there. I like the maps and charts they produce to graphically illustrate the issue. I can't vouch for the accuracy of these numbers but that's kind of the point. We just don't know what we really should know.


Conflict /Death Toll

Democratic Republic of Congo /5,400,000

Southern Sudan /1,200,000

Angola /800,000

Rwanda /800,000

Afghanistan /500,000

Somalia /400,000

Iraq /400,000

Burundi /300,000

Darfur /300,000

Zaire /300,000

Liberia /200,000

Algeria /150,000

Ethiopia-Eritrea /100,000

Chechnya /100,000

Uganda /100,000

Sierra Leone /50,000

Kashmir /50,000

Colombia /50,000

Sri Lanka /50,000

Bosnia-Herzegovina /50,000

Philippines /20,000

Turkey /20,000

Nigeria /20,000

Gulf War /20,000

Azerbaijan /20,000

Bougainville /20,000

Cote d’Ivoire /10,000

Congo, Republic of /10,000

Peru /10,000

Aceh /10,000

Myanmar /10,000

Nepal /10,000

Croatia /10,000

Kosovo /10,000

Kurdish Iraq /10,000

Southern Iraq /10,000

Senegal /< 10,000

Guinea /< 10,000

Chad /< 10,000

Mali /< 10,000

Niger /< 10,000

Central African Republic /< 10,000

Haiti /< 10,000

Mexico /< 10,000

Israel-Palestine /< 10,000

Israel-Lebanon /< 10,000

Yemen /< 10,000

Andrha Pradesh /< 10,000

Gujurat /< 10,000

Northeast India /< 10,000

East Timor /< 10,000

Irian Jaya /< 10,000

Kalimantan /< 10,000

Molucca Islands /< 10,000

Sulawesi /< 10,000

Georgia /< 10,000

Moldova /< 10,000

Northern Ireland /< 10,000


3
"Some would say that while those smaller conflicts may not have the same number of deaths they still impact far more people. I believe that is true. But why is that? There is something wrong about the way we value people."

Indeed.

It seems to go something like this:

If the people speak English as a native language, add 5.

If the people speak another western European language as a native language, add 3.

If the people are Christian, add 2.

If the people are brown, subtract 1.

If the people are yellow, subtract 2.

If the people are black, subtract 5.

Subtract 1 for every 2,000 miles distance.

If the GDP per capita is above the world average, add 3.

If the GDP per capita is below the world average, subtract 1.

If the GDP per capita is below the 25th percentile, subtract 3.

If the country is subjected to the same type of crisis every 10 years or less, subtract 2.

If the country is in Africa, subtract 10.

At least, that seems how it plays out to me. So most of those conflicts are in Africa, and most of the world just doesn't give a rat's. I have lots of theories why, but mostly I think it comes down to a combination of racism, post-colonial feelings of guilt, racism, pernicious problems that don't go away, racism, corrupt governments being part of the problem to their own people, racism, western economies raping the natural resources at low, low prices, and, oh yeah - racism.
Nice formula. The odd one is the +2 for Christians. Actually, I think Africa may be the most Christian continent in the world so that one doesn't add up. I think it is mainly about resources and racism.

One of the big problems for African countries post-colonial was the cold war. Money and support were thrown around by both East and West to whoever could deliver the UN vote. It didn't really matter how corrupt or dictatorial the person was. Now the same thing is happening with the West, China, Arab nations, and new socialists like Chavez.

The world wide economic problems will hurt Africa too. They are the next cheap labor force for global industry but the current economic climate will delay that for a few more decades.
I did the +2 for Christians because in some sense that's the only reason they are on the US radar screen, I think. Although there are lots of Christians in Rwanda and that didn't seem to help either on the ground between the factions or in getting other countries involved.

As for being the next cheap labor force, I don't even know if it's a "few" more decades. Lack of education, lack of nutrition, corrupt governments, ongoing tribalism that just never seems to get any better and AIDS are going to keep the continent down for a long time to come.

Pessimistic, I know, but some friends and I have been talking about Africa for two decades now, and it just doesn't seem to get any better (and in fact, adding AIDS to the mix has made it much, much worse). Basically they get to be the continent where everyone else on the planet can say, "Well, it may be bad here, but at least we're not in Africa!"
 
photo

I'm Tom. I have a wonderful wife, 4 kids, a dog, and a cat. What more could a guy want.

@Tue 24 Feb, 2009 20:16Green Banner: 24 February, 2009Green Banner Vector Graphic http://tinyurl.com/an5ptx

Template and Icons by DryIcons.com